This is one of the most common questions in any design engagement, and it's usually asked because someone got burned — either a client who ran out of revisions unexpectedly, or a designer who spent three weeks on unlimited changes.
The number matters less than the definition. Here's how to think about both.
Most project-based design work includes somewhere between two and three rounds of revisions. Larger identity projects sometimes include more, structured by phase rather than by count.
But two rounds where a round means "one consolidated set of feedback" is a completely different deal than two rounds where a round means "any change request." The definition is what you're actually negotiating.
Most design projects include two to three revision rounds. What matters more than the number is the definition of a round — one consolidated set of feedback is very different from any individual change request, and the two produce very different projects.
A revision is a refinement within the direction already chosen. Adjusting type size, swapping a photo, changing a color, tightening copy, moving an element. The concept stays; the execution improves.
A new direction is starting over. Rejecting the approach, changing the brief, or deciding to go somewhere entirely different. That's new work, not a revision, and it's reasonable for it to be priced as such.
Most disputes come from this line being undefined rather than from anyone acting badly. Both sides had a different idea of what they'd agreed to.
It sounds generous. It usually isn't.
The price already accounts for it. Nobody offers genuinely unlimited work at a fixed fee without building the expected excess into the number. You're pre-paying for revisions you may not need.
It removes decision points. Defined rounds force consolidated feedback and actual decisions. Unlimited rounds let a project drift indefinitely, which is worse for the outcome, not better.
It makes projects worse. Design improved through forty small unrelated changes tends to lose coherence. Constraints produce better work than infinite optionality.
Defined rounds with a clear hourly rate for anything beyond is a healthier structure for both sides.
The client side of this matters more than most people realize.
Consolidate feedback. Gather every stakeholder's input before sending anything. Three people sending separate emails across four days burns a round and produces contradictory instructions.
Say what's wrong, not what to do. "This feels heavier than our brand" gives a designer something to solve. "Make the logo blue" is a solution to a problem you haven't described — and it might be the wrong one.
Get the decision-maker involved early. The most expensive revision is the one from someone who saw the work for the first time at round three.
Be direct. Vague, polite feedback produces vague changes and burns rounds. Designers would rather hear that something isn't working.
To use revision rounds efficiently, consolidate all stakeholder feedback before sending, describe what isn't working rather than prescribing a fix, and involve the final decision-maker before the last round. Most wasted revisions come from fragmented or late feedback.
Six questions, answered before anyone starts, prevent nearly every revision dispute that happens.
How many revisions should be included in a design project?
Typically two to three rounds for project-based work, with larger identity projects sometimes structured by phase. The definition of a round matters more than the number.
What counts as a design revision?
A refinement within the chosen direction — adjusting type, color, imagery, or layout. Changing the direction entirely is new work rather than a revision, and is usually priced separately.
Are unlimited revisions a good deal?
Usually not. The price typically accounts for expected excess, and unlimited rounds remove the decision points that keep a project moving. Defined rounds plus a clear hourly rate for anything beyond is healthier for both sides.
What happens if I use all my revisions and still aren't happy?
Most designers will continue at an hourly rate. If the work fundamentally isn't right after several rounds, it's usually worth revisiting the brief rather than continuing to adjust.
How do I give feedback that doesn't waste a revision round?
Consolidate all stakeholder input first, describe what isn't working rather than prescribing a specific fix, and make sure the final decision-maker has seen the work before you respond.
Can I add revisions to a project later?
Generally yes, at an hourly or per-round rate. Agreeing on that rate at the start avoids an awkward conversation in the middle.
Want a scope you can actually plan around? Schedule a free consultation at jpetrous.com | contact@jpetrous.com | 586-563-6634.
.jpg)
.jpg)
The businesses winning in Michigan aren't chasing trends. Jonathan Petrous shares a practical 2027 marketing playbook built specifically for the Michigan small business market.
Read More
Great local businesses in Marysville, Chesterfield, and Macomb Township are invisible online — and it's fixable. Jonathan Petrous explains the three most common causes and exactly what to do about them.
Read More
Tight marketing budget in Port Huron or the surrounding area? Jonathan Petrous shares the highest-leverage moves local businesses can make right now — most of them free or nearly free.
Read More
Before you go
Call or send a message. Tell me what you're working on and I'll tell you honestly whether I'm the right fit.